Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493721›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Stochastic gene expression in proliferating cells: Differing noise intensity in single-cell and population perspectives.

Zhanhao Zhang, Iryna Zabaikina, Cesar Nieto, Zahra Vahdat, Pavol Bokes, Abhyudai Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhanhao ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Iryna ZabaikinaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Cesar NietoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-4619
Zahra VahdatDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Pavol BokesDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Abhyudai SinghDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mathematical Sciences, Center of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-2838

Funding

Generalized fluctuation test for deciphering phenotypic switching within cell populationsR35GM148351 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Abhyudai Singh · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random fluctuations (noise) in gene expression can be studied from two complementary perspectives: following expression in a single cell over time or comparing expression between cells in a proliferating population at a given time. Here, we systematically investigated scenarios where both perspectives can lead to different levels of noise in a given gene product. We first consider a stable protein, whose concentration is diluted by cellular growth. This protein inhibits growth at high concentrations, establishing a positive feedback loop. Using a stochastic model with molecular bursting of gene products, we analytically predict and contrast the steady-state distributions of protein concentration in both frameworks. Although positive feedback amplifies the noise in expression, this amplification is much higher in the population framework compared to following a single cell over time. We also study other processes that lead to different noise levels even in the absence of such dilution-based feedback. When considering randomness in the partitioning of molecules between daughters during mitosis, we find that in the single-cell perspective, the noise in protein concentration is independent of noise in the cell cycle duration. In contrast, partitioning noise is amplified in the population perspective by increasing randomness in cell-cycle time. Overall, our results show that the single-cell framework that does not account for proliferating cells can, in some cases, underestimate the noise in gene product levels. These results have important implications for studying the inter-cellular variation of different stress-related expression programs across cell types that are known to inhibit cellular growth.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationGene ExpressionSingle-Cell AnalysisCell CycleComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, BiologicalStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID40493721
PMCPMC12151482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.