Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493663›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Vaccine wastage rates and attributed factors in rural and urban areas in Uganda: Case of Mukono and Kalungu districts.

Mackline Ninsiima, Michael Muhoozi, Henry Luzze, Simon Kasasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mackline NinsiimaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1081-3124
Michael MuhooziDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Henry LuzzeMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Simon KasasaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-0709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine wastage remains a challenge to effective immunization; especially in low-income countries. We estimated vaccine wastage rates and assessed attributed factors in Mukono and Kalungu districts in Uganda. A mixed methods study design was utilised to estimate vaccine wastage rates for BGC, OPV, IPV, PCV, MR, DPT-HepB-Hib for 6 months prospectively from March-August 2022 and assess attributed factors in 22 health facilities. Mann-Kendall statistical test was used to assess significance of observed trends. We applied Mann Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests to compare vaccine wastage rates per vaccine by district, ownership, and type of health facility. Additionally, we administered a questionnaire among 57 health workers and conducted 15 Key Informant Interviews to understand reasons for vaccine wastage. Overall vaccine wastage rates were BCG (70%), MR (58%), DPT-HepB-Hib (21%), IPV (31%), OPV (28%) and PCV (17%); exceeding accepted vaccine wastage rates in Kalungu and Mukono districts. Significant variations were observed across the different types of health facilities [BCG (p < 0.001), IPV (p = 0.023), MR (p = 0.004) and OPV (0.008)] and among health facilities located within urban and rural areas [BCG (p < 0.001), MR (p < 0.001) and OPV (0.003)]. Vaccine wastage rates for BCG and MR vaccines were higher compared to other vaccines because remaining doses in opened vials were discarded within 6 hours of reconstitution, as per the Multi Dose Vial Policy (MDVP). Other contributing factors were low turn up during outreaches, errors and non-completion of vaccine monitoring tools, cold chain failures and inadequate training in vaccine management. Vaccine wastage rates for all vaccines were relatively higher than acceptable levels in both districts. Intensified efforts such as regular review of vial opening guidelines, predictive modelling for outreach planning, decentralized vaccination approaches, and availability of vaccines in reduced-volume multi-dose vials where feasible could minimize vaccine wastage.

Identifiers

PMID40493663
PMCPMC12151339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.