Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493646›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Sedimentary ancient DNA as part of a multimethod paleoparasitology approach reveals temporal trends in human parasitic burden in the Roman period.

Marissa L Ledger, Tyler J Murchie, Zachery Dickson, Melanie Kuch, Scott D Haddow, Christopher J Knüsel, Gil J Stein, Mike Parker Pearson, Rachel Ballantyne, Mark Knight and 13 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Marissa L LedgerDepartment of Archaeology, The Henry Wellcome Building, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5501-6590
Tyler J MurchieMcMaster Ancient DNA Centre, Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Zachery DicksonDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Melanie KuchMcMaster Ancient DNA Centre, Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Scott D HaddowDepartment of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher J KnüselCNRS, MC, PACEA, UMR, Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Gil J SteinInstitute for the Study of Ancient Cultures (ISAC), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Mike Parker PearsonInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel BallantyneMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mark KnightCambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Koen DeforceDepartment of Archaeology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maureen CarrollDepartment of Archaeology, University of New York, New York, United Kingdom.
Candace RiceJoukowsky Institute for Archaeology & the Ancient World and Department of Classics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Tyler FranconiJoukowsky Institute for Archaeology & the Ancient World and Department of Classics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Nataša ŠarkićAita Bioarchaeology, Barcelona, Spain.
Saša RedžičInstitute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia.
Erica RowanDepartment of Classics, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas CahillDepartment of Art History, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jeroen PoblomeUnit of Archaeology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Maria de Fátima PalmaCampo Arqueológico de Mértola/CEAACP, Mértola, Portugal.
Helmut BrücknerInstitute of Geography, University of Cologne, Cologne (Köln), Germany.
Piers D MitchellDepartment of Archaeology, The Henry Wellcome Building, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hendrik PoinarMcMaster Ancient DNA Centre, Department of Anthropology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CANA FoundationEuropean and International Trust and Trinity Hall CollegeSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaSociety for the Promotion of Roman StudiesTidmarsh Cambridge Scholarship from the Cambridge Commonwealth
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of parasite infections in past populations has classically relied on microscopic analysis of sediment samples and coprolites. In recent years, additional methods have been integrated into paleoparasitology such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ancient DNA (aDNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate a multimethod approach for paleoparasitology using microscopy, ELISA, and sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) with a parasite-specific targeted capture approach and high-throughput sequencing. Using 26 samples dating from c. 6400 BCE to 1500 CE that were previously analyzed with microscopy and ELISA, we aimed to more accurately detect and reconstruct parasite diversity in the Roman Empire and compare this diversity to earlier and later time periods to explore temporal changes in parasite diversity. Microscopy was found to be the most effective technique for identifying the eggs of helminths, with 8 taxa identified. ELISA was the most sensitive for detecting protozoa that cause diarrhea (notably Giardia duodenalis). Parasite DNA was recovered from 9 samples, with no parasite DNA recovered from any pre-Roman sites. Sedimentary DNA analysis identified whipworm at a site where only roundworm was visible on microscopy, and also revealed that the whipworm eggs at another site came from two different species (Trichuris trichiura and Trichuris muris). Our results show that a multimethod approach provides the most comprehensive reconstruction of parasite diversity in past populations. In the pre-Roman period, taxonomic diversity included a mixed spectrum of zoonotic parasites, together with whipworm, which is spread by ineffective sanitation. We see a marked change during the Roman and medieval periods with an increasing dominance of parasites transmitted by ineffective sanitation, especially roundworm, whipworm and protozoa that cause diarrheal illness.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientGeologic SedimentsParasitesParasitic DiseasesAnimalsDNA, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesHelminthsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistory, AncientHumansMicroscopyPaleopathologyParasitologyRoman WorldDNA, AncientDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID40493646
PMCPMC12151383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.