Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493622›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparing UNet configurations for anthropogenic geomorphic feature extraction from land surface parameters.

Sarah Farhadpour, Aaron E Maxwell

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah FarhadpourWest Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.
Aaron E MaxwellWest Virginia University Department of Geology and Geography, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-5599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning for semantic segmentation has revolutionized image analysis, particularly in the geospatial and medical fields. UNet, an encoder-decoder architecture, has been suggested to be particularly effective. However, limitations such as small sample sizes and class imbalance in anthropogenic geomorphic feature extraction tasks have necessitated the exploration of advanced modifications to improve model performance. This study investigates a variety of architectural modifications to base UNet including replacing the rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function with leaky ReLU or swish; incorporating residual connections within the encoder blocks, decoder blocks, and bottleneck; inserting squeeze and excitation modules into the encoder or attention gate modules along the skip connections; replacing the default bottleneck layer with one that incorporates dilated convolution; and using a MobileNetV2 architecture as an encoder backbone. Unique geomorphic datasets derived from high spatial resolution lidar data were used to evaluate the performance of these modified UNet architectures on the tasks of mapping agricultural terraces, mine benches, and valley fill faces. The results were further analyzed across varying training sample sizes (50, 100, 250, 500, and the full training set). Our results suggest that the incorporation of advanced modules can enhance segmentation performance, particularly in scenarios involving limited training data or complex geomorphic landscapes. However, differences were minimal when larger training set sizes were used (e.g., above 500 image chips) and the base UNet architecture was generally adequate. This research contributes valuable insights into the optimization of UNet-based models for anthropogenic geomorphic feature extraction and provides a foundation for future work aimed at improving the accuracy and efficiency of deep learning approaches in geospatial applications. We argue that one of the positive attributes of UNet is that it can be treated as a general framework that can easily be modified.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40493622
PMCPMC12151443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.