ArticlePloS one2025
Characterization of the genomic landscape of canine oral osteosarcoma reveals similarities with appendicular osteosarcoma.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Multiomic Profiling Enhances Risk Stratification and Prognostication in Canine Osteosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common bone tumor in both dogs and humans. It predominantly occurs in the appendicular skeleton, with about 25% of cases occurring within the axial skeleton. Progression of local disease is often the life-limiting factor for patients with axial OS, in contrast to appendicular OS, where local disease is addressed surgically, and metastatic disease remains the primary obstacle. While OS is a rare human cancer, limiting the availability of samples, its higher incidence in dogs provides a valuable comparative model for study. Both canines and humans share commonalities in clinical presentation, but dogs have an accelerated progression. Similarly, complex structural genetic changes define appendicular OS in both dogs and people, but it is unclear whether the genomic landscape of axial OS exhibits different alterations that may separate it from appendicular OS. We performed pilot whole genome sequencing of canine primary oral (maxillary or mandibular) OS tumors (n = 8) and matched normal tissue. We found that the genetics of canine oral OS largely parallel the genetics of canine appendicular OS, including an overall low number of recurrent point mutations affecting the same gene (TP53 and SETD2, 3/8 samples). Structural variants dominated the landscape of mutational changes, with recurrent variants in DMD (4/8) and DLG2 (3/8) found at a similar incidence to appendicular OS. This pilot suggests genomic similarities between oral and appendicular OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.