ArticlePloS one2025
Enhancing ECG disease detection accuracy through deep learning models and P-QRS-T waveform features.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Demographic-aware temporal graph attention for fair and accurate cardiac abnormality detection in 12-lead ECG.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dual-database Bibliometric Analysis Combined with Gephi-based Network Visualization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Identification and Diagnosis of Thyroid Space-occupying Lesions.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- MAF-Net: Multimodal cross-attention-based fusion network for cardiovascular disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- An explainable deep learning framework for trustworthy arrhythmia detection from ECG signals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have surpassed cancer and become the major cause of death worldwide. An electrocardiogram (ECG) is a non-invasive and quicker method for diagnosing abnormal heart conditions. While research has extensively focused on ECG analysis for disease classification, it has been primarily directed toward binary classification or classification of Arrhythmias, highlighting the dire need for detailed classification models. This study utilises the extensive PTB-XL database ECG records to develop a robust method for classifying various heart abnormalities. The data with unique labels is filtered through the Butterworth bandpass filter and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) db-8. The R-peaks of the clean signal were used to detect the subsequent morphological features, i.e., P-QRS-T intervals and amplitudes. The feature set was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique for Nominal and Continuous (SMOTE-NC) and fed into Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) with 5-fold cross-validation. The models classified the ECG records into one normal and four abnormal classes: Conduction Disturbance (CD), Myocardial Infarction (MI), Hypertrophy (HYP), and ST-T Changes (STTC). Performance metrics such as F1 score, recall, precision, and accuracy were evaluated for each model. The CNN model achieved a mean accuracy of 81% ± 0.03, while the DNN model achieved a mean accuracy of 84% ± 0.01. One key finding is that Hypertrophy (HYP) was consistently classified with up to 98% accuracy. Thus, the study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining advanced signal processing and deep learning techniques for precise multi-class heart disease classification using P-QRS-T features, paving the way for future real-time clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.