ArticlePloS one2025
Prediction of electrical load demand using combined LHS with ANFIS.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancement prediction of load demand is crucial for effective energy management and resource allocation in modern power systems and especially in medical segment. Proposed method leverages strengths of ANFIS in learning complex nonlinear relationships inherent in load demand data. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, researchers conducted hybrid methodology combine LHS with ANFIS, using actual load demand readings. Comparative analysis investigates performing various machine learning models, including Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) alone, and ANFIS combined with Latin Hypercube sampling (LHS), in predicting electrical load demand. The paper explores enhancing ANFIS through LHS compared with Monte Carlo (MC) method to improve predictive accuracy. It involves simulating energy demand patterns over 1000 iterations, using performance metrics through Mean Squared Error (MSE). The study shows superior predictive performance of ANFIS-LHS model, achieving higher accuracy and robustness in load demand prediction across different time horizons and scenarios. Thus, findings of this research contribute to advanced developments rather than previous research by introducing a combined predictive methodology that leverages LHS to ensure solving limitations of previous methods like structured, stratified sampling of input variables, reducing overfitting and enhancing adaptability to varying data sizes. Additionally, it incorporates sensitivity analysis and risk assessment, significantly improving predictive accuracy. Using Python and Simulink Matlab, Combined LHS with ANFIS showing accuracy of 96.42% improvement over the ANFIS model alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.