Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493598›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Bridging and bonding: The roles of brokerage and closure in mobilizing support provision in online support groups.

Sanguk Lee, Tai-Quan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sanguk LeeDepartment of Communication Studies, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-0867
Tai-Quan PengDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2588-7491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social capital theory suggests that network structure influences human behavior. Based on this premise, this study investigates how two distinct network structures-brokerage and closure-affect support provision in Online Support Groups (OSGs). Twelve years of data were collected from an online cancer community based in South Korea. Using computational methods, we measured support behaviors, network structures, and social capital. The findings reveal that brokers, through exposure to non-redundant information, provide social support in larger volumes, with higher quality, and in a more timely manner. While closure has limited explanatory power for overall support behaviors, it specifically facilitates provision of improved quality of emotional support through one's enhanced trust. Additionally, the results highlight the importance of recognizing the dynamic developmental stages of OSGs to fully understand the social mechanisms driving support provision. These findings offer significant insights into the mobilization of social support through network structures in the OSG context.

Indexed as

Self-Help GroupsSocial SupportFemaleHumansInternetMaleNeoplasmsRepublic of KoreaSocial CapitalSocial Networking

Identifiers

PMID40493598
PMCPMC12151367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.