ArticlePloS one2025
Dispersal dynamics of white-tailed deer in human-altered landscapes and implications for disease risk.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal dispersal and migration can play critical roles in population dynamics and species distribution, and these behaviors often are influenced by their environment. The conversion from natural habitats to agricultural lands has altered over 40% of terrestrial surfaces and many wildlife species now inhabit landscapes that are fragmented or heavily composed of agriculture. Understanding how habitat drives patterns of dispersal or migration is of critical importance to population management, particularly in environments that may be changing rapidly with human presence and when considering emerging disease threats. We evaluated how habitat and agriculture in and around white-tailed deer natal ranges in southeastern Minnesota, USA influenced both the probability of dispersal and migration events and the distance animals traveled during those events. Counter to our predictions, we found no evidence that agriculture in the natal range influenced the probability that white-tailed deer would disperse or migrate. Sex, however, played an important role in shaping movement behaviors-compared with resident deer, males were 2.7 times more likely to disperse and 5.2 times less likely to migrate than females. Moreover, while agriculture did not influence the probability of a dispersal event occurring, it did influence the distance traveled with deer dispersing farther in areas with more agriculture and avoiding agriculture during dispersal events. Our results provide insight into the influence of habitat on key movement behaviors that may be extremely important for population management, especially in areas that may have a high prevalence of infectious disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.