ArticlePloS one2025
Quantifying the influence of optical coherence tomography beam tilt in each retinal layer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macular Metabolism in Young and Older Adults: A Preliminary Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarker Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of retinal structure changes with AI-based OCT image segmentation for sodium iodate induced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeWell-aligned microstructures within the retina - like retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) axons - differentially reflect light depending on its angle. Our goal was to quantify the influence of optical coherence tomography (OCT) beam tilt on reflectivity of each layer of the mouse retina. MethodsWe collected OCT images in a single plane capturing the optic nerve head, temporal retina, and nasal retina, while tilting the OCT beam at various angles. We converted signal intensities to estimated attenuation coefficients (eAC). The attenuation coefficient describes how quickly the remainder of an OCT beam's light is absorbed or scattered at a given depth into the retina. A single-ellipse model based on prior literature was calculated at each retinal depth, describing the maximum eAC across all tilts (ellipse semi-major axis), the beam tilt eliciting that maximum eAC, and eAC's dependence on beam tilt (semi-major versus semi-minor axes). Post hoc, the inner retina bore an unexpectedly complex relationship between beam tilt and eAC, which we explored with a two-ellipse model. ResultseACs in the temporal and nasal retina were dissimilar at specific beam tilts, but this was near-completely explained by differences in microstructure alignment. Dependence on beam tilt was substantial over the photoreceptors, but non-zero in all retinal layers. Post-hoc, two-ellipse models implied that microstructures vitread to the external limiting membrane were well-aligned with the photoreceptor inner and outer segments, and a small fraction (≥0.3%) of that tissue is especially translucent. ConclusionWe mapped microstructure alignment throughout the retina. Expected findings at the photoreceptor inner and outer segments are complemented by new evidence of unusually translucent microstructures spanning much of the retina, possibly representing Müller glia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.