ArticlePloS one2025
Dynamic response force control of electrohydraulic servo actuator of active suspension based on intelligent optimization algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional PID control faces challenges in addressing parameter uncertainty and nonlinearity in active suspension electrohydraulic servo actuators, leading to suboptimal performance. To address these challenges, a fractional-order PID (FOPID) controller optimization method based on the Multi-Strategy Improved Beluga Whale Optimization (MSIBWO) algorithm is proposed. Simulation results in MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate that the MSIBWO-FOPID controller significantly outperforms traditional PID and BWO-FOPID controllers in force tracking and robustness. For step input, the rise time and the root mean square error(RMSE) are reduced by 66.7[Formula: see text] and 70.3[Formula: see text], respectively, compared to BWO-FOPID. For sine inputs, the system achieves better disturbance rejection and higher precision. Using a half-car model, the MSIBWO-FOPID controller improves ride comfort significantly. Under random road excitation, the RMSE values of the vehicle body's vertical acceleration and pitch angle acceleration are reduced by 51.7[Formula: see text] and 13.1[Formula: see text], respectively, compared to passive suspension, outperforming both PID and BWO-FOPID controllers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.