ArticlePloS one2025
Research on APT groups malware classification based on TCN-GAN.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) malware attacks, characterized by their stealth, persistence, and high destructiveness, have become a critical focus in cybersecurity defense for large organizations. Verifying and identifying the sources and affiliated groups of APT malware is one of the effective means to counter APT attacks. This paper addresses the issue of tracing and attributing APT malware groups. By improving and innovating the extraction methods for image features and disassembled instruction N-gram features of APT malware, and based on the Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) model, the paper achieves high-accuracy classification and identification of APT malware. To mitigate the impact of insufficient APT malware samples and data imbalance on classification performance, the paper employs Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to expand the sample size. Validation on both public and self-constructed datasets shows that the proposed method achieves an accuracy and precision rate of 99.8%, significantly outperforming other methods. This work provides a foundation for subsequent countermeasures and accountability against related APT attack groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.