ArticlePloS one2025
A knowledge-based equation of daily work exposure.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to establish a predictive equation that expresses the daily work exposure as a function of variables that define complex work tasks. The equation was verified with data reported in reviewed publications. The ScienceDirect, PubMed, and ProQuest databases were searched using keywords related to variables that characterize intermittent tasks and those that describe muscle fatigue resulting from these tasks. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established to focus on task characteristics and study participants. The primary criterion for accepting studies was a quantitative definition of the tasks performed, specifically concerning the level of force exerted over a specified period. Only studies involving healthy individuals aged 18-70 years that reported voluntary muscle contractions were deemed eligible. The adjustment of the prediction equation was based on the assumptions that for the same values of variables that characterize work, the exposure calculated by the equation is equivalent to musculoskeletal load, and that the level of musculoskeletal load at a given time determines the experimentally measured decrease in force capabilities. Thirty-seven datasets of independent variables (those that define work tasks) and dependent variable relevant to the decrease in force capabilities were accepted to establish the equation. Based on the comparison of dependent data from experimental studies with data obtained from calculations using independent variables, the equation that provided the best fit was identified. The correlation between the calculations and experimental results was found to be 0.72. The equation distinguishes work tasks by considering variables such as relative force, time of task, mean exposure, and the similarity of tasks performed throughout the daily work. It provides a tool for determining the work exposure associated with a specific set of tasks, which may cover the entire work shift or only parts of it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.