ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Addressing alcohol dependence in primary care: longitudinal registry-based study of practitioner activity following new policy and access to training.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the extent to which two new implementation strategies-a new policy mandating alcohol interventions in primary care and access to online training, impacted alcohol-related clinical activities in primary care in Stockholm. This was a prospective longitudinal register-based study. One hundred twenty-nine primary care clinics in Region Stockholm agreed to provide data. The new healthcare policy was introduced in February 2021. A brief digital training for primary care professionals on managing harmful alcohol use and dependence was launched 10 months later. Seven indicators that reflect alcohol-related clinical activities were obtained from electronic case files: structured documentation on alcohol habits, the AUDIT instrument, ordering of blood tests for biomarkers of heavy drinking, prescription of medicines for alcohol dependence, registered alcohol-related diagnoses, completed advice regarding alcohol use disorder (AUD), and referrals to specialized care. Data from registers were collected before and after the policy and training was available. At baseline low levels of alcohol-related clinical activities were found in primary care. A modest, clinically non-significant increase was seen for all indicators except for frequency of prescription of medicines for alcohol dependence, over the whole follow-up. The digital training was not associated with an increase in alcohol-related clinical activities. While a policy making alcohol interventions mandatory, combined with a training program, has strong support from implementation science, only a modest, clinically non-significant increase in alcohol-related clinical activities was found. Stronger implementation strategies seem necessary to improve management of alcohol dependence in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.