Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493528›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Incorporating end-user perspectives into the development of a machine learning algorithm for first time perinatal depression prediction.

Kelly Williams, Cara Nikolajski, Samantha Rodriguez, Elaine Kwok, Priya Gopalan, Hyagriv Simhan, Tamar Krishnamurti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical and health informatics Potpourri.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly WilliamsUPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Cara NikolajskiUPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Samantha RodriguezDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Elaine KwokUPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States.
Priya GopalanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Hyagriv SimhanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
Tamar KrishnamurtiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.

Funding

Peripartum Depression Prevention: Algorithmic Identification and Digital SolutionsR34MH130950 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KRISHNAMURTI, TAMAR · 2022 to 2024
$536k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH130950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMachine learning algorithms can advance clinical care, including identifying mental health conditions. These algorithms are often developed without considering the perspectives of the affected populations. This study describes the process of incorporating end-user perspectives into the development and implementation planning of a prediction algorithm for new perinatal depression onset. MATERIALS AND

methodsA focus group (N = 12 providers) and four virtual community engagement studios (N = 21 patients) were conducted. The project team presented on the initial development of a novel prediction algorithm used to detect first time perinatal depression. Rapid qualitative analysis coded the prediction algorithm's completeness, interpretability, and acceptability to stakeholders, with the goal of informing clinical implementation of a patient-facing screener produced from the prediction algorithm.

resultsProviders and patients showed consensus on the interpretability of the prediction algorithm's variables and discussed additional variables believed to be predictive of depression to ensure its completeness. In terms of acceptability, patients expressed a desire to discuss predictive risk screening results with their provider, while providers voiced concerns about limited bandwidth for these discussions. Both groups identified the need for post-screening resource connection but raised concerns over the availability of depression prevention specific resources. Providers and patients reported positively about their engagement in the sessions. DISCUSSION: Qualitative findings were incorporated into iterative algorithm development and informed an implementation pilot plan.

conclusionThis study demonstrates how the expertise of the end-users of a risk prediction algorithm can be incorporated into its development, which may ultimately increase clinical adoption.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDepressionMachine LearningAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePregnancydepressionhuman centered designmachine learningparticipatory researchprediction algorithmpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40493528
PMCPMC12199750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.