ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Incorporating end-user perspectives into the development of a machine learning algorithm for first time perinatal depression prediction.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Prevention-Focused Screener for Perinatal Depression Risk: Mixed Methods Cohort Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- A qualitative interview study investigating patient, health professional, and developer perspectives on real-world implementation of patient-centered AI systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Applicable Scenarios, Desired Features, and Risks of AI Psychotherapists in Depression Treatment From the Patient's Perspective: Exploratory Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Community feedback sessions: An adaptation of the community engagement studio model to enhance scalability.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- A qualitative Interview Study Investigating Patient, Health Professional, and Developer Perspectives on Real-World Implementation of Patient-Centered AI Systems.Research square · 2025Article
- Biomedical and health informatics Potpourri.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMachine learning algorithms can advance clinical care, including identifying mental health conditions. These algorithms are often developed without considering the perspectives of the affected populations. This study describes the process of incorporating end-user perspectives into the development and implementation planning of a prediction algorithm for new perinatal depression onset. MATERIALS AND
methodsA focus group (N = 12 providers) and four virtual community engagement studios (N = 21 patients) were conducted. The project team presented on the initial development of a novel prediction algorithm used to detect first time perinatal depression. Rapid qualitative analysis coded the prediction algorithm's completeness, interpretability, and acceptability to stakeholders, with the goal of informing clinical implementation of a patient-facing screener produced from the prediction algorithm.
resultsProviders and patients showed consensus on the interpretability of the prediction algorithm's variables and discussed additional variables believed to be predictive of depression to ensure its completeness. In terms of acceptability, patients expressed a desire to discuss predictive risk screening results with their provider, while providers voiced concerns about limited bandwidth for these discussions. Both groups identified the need for post-screening resource connection but raised concerns over the availability of depression prevention specific resources. Providers and patients reported positively about their engagement in the sessions. DISCUSSION: Qualitative findings were incorporated into iterative algorithm development and informed an implementation pilot plan.
conclusionThis study demonstrates how the expertise of the end-users of a risk prediction algorithm can be incorporated into its development, which may ultimately increase clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.