Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493514›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.

Emma Coen, Guilherme Del Fiol, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Emerson Borsato, Jackilen Shannon, Hadley Smith, Aaron Masino, Caitlin G Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. GARDE-Chat: a scalable, open-source platform for building and deploying health chatbots.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Evidence-Based Analysis of AI Chatbots in Oncology Patient Education: Implications for Trust, Perceived Realness, and Misinformation Management.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma CoenSchool of Computing, Clemson University, 105 Sikes Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-5724-1298
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-9080
Emerson BorsatoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2786-6395
Jackilen ShannonCancer Population Sciences, Div. Oncological Science, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-9511
Hadley SmithDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-6535
Aaron MasinoSchool of Computing, Clemson University, 105 Sikes Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2684-0548
Caitlin G AllenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6288-3529

Funding

GARDE: Scalable Clinical Decision Support for Individualized Cancer Risk ManagementU24CA274582 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GUILHERME DEL FIOL, Kensaku Kawamoto · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The increasing demand for population-wide genomic screening and the limited availability of genetic counseling resources have created a pressing need for innovative service delivery models. Chatbots powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in genomic services, particularly in pretest counseling, but their application in returning positive population-wide genomic screening results remains underexplored. Leveraging advanced LLMs like GPT-4 offers an opportunity to address this gap by delivering accurate, contextual, and user-centered communication to individuals receiving positive genetic test results. This project aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a chatbot integrated with GPT-4, tailored to support the return of positive genomic screening results in the context of South Carolina's In Our DNA SC program. This initiative offers free genetic screening to 100,000 individuals, with over 33,000 results returned and numerous positive findings for conditions such as Lynch syndrome, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia. A 3-step prompt engineering process using retrieval-augmented generation and few-shot techniques was used to create the chatbot. Training materials included patient frequently asked questions, genetic counseling scripts, and patient-derived queries. The chatbot underwent iterative refinement based on 13 training questions, while performance was evaluated through expert ratings on responses to 2 hypothetical patient scenarios. The 2 scenarios were intended to represent common but distinct patient profiles in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, age, and background knowledge. Domain experts rated the chatbot using a 5-point Likert scale across 8 predefined criteria: tone, clarity, program accuracy, domain accuracy, robustness, efficiency, boundaries, and usability. The chatbot achieved an average score of 3.86 (SD 0.89) across all evaluation metrics. The highest-rated criteria were tone (mean 4.25, SD 0.71) and usability (mean 4.25, SD 0.58), reflecting the chatbot's ability to communicate effectively and provide a seamless user experience. Boundary management (mean 4.0, SD 0.76) and efficiency (mean 3.88, SD 1.08) also scored well, while clarity and robustness received ratings of 3.81 (SD 1.05) and 3.81 (SD 0.66), respectively. Domain accuracy was rated 3.63 (SD 0.96), indicating satisfactory performance in delivering genetic information, whereas program accuracy received the lowest score of 3.25 (SD 1.39), highlighting the need for improvements in delivering program-specific details. This project demonstrates the feasibility of using LLM-powered chatbots to support the return of positive genomic screening results. The chatbot effectively handled open-ended patient queries, maintained conversational boundaries, and delivered user-friendly responses. However, enhancements in program-specific accuracy are essential to maximize its utility. Future research will explore hybrid chatbot designs that combine the strengths of LLMs with rule-based components to improve scalability, accuracy, and accessibility in genomic service delivery. The findings underscore the potential of generative artificial intelligence tools to address resource limitations and improve the accessibility of genomic health care services.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleSouth Carolinacancerchatbotcounselingengineeringfew-shot learninggeneticsgenomiclarge language modelLLMmobile phonepopulation screening programpromptprompt engineeringRAGretrieval-augmented generationscreeningsyndrome

Identifiers

PMID40493514
PMCPMC12172806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.