ReviewAnnual review of vision science2025
What V1 Damage Can Teach Us About Visual Perception and Learning.
Review in Annual review of vision science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic arcminute-scale fixational offsets in patients with early visual cortex damage.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In humans, occipital strokes invariably damage the primary visual cortex (V1), causing a loss of conscious vision over large portions of the visual field. This unfortunate experiment of nature affects a significant proportion of all stroke victims, but there is a lack of accepted vision restoration therapies clinically, despite a rich history of studies into the resulting visual deficit and the perceptual abilities that paradoxically survive in affected portions of the visual field. Over the last two decades, the clinical dogma that V1-damaged adult visual systems cannot recover has been challenged by accumulating evidence that visual retraining to detect or discriminate stimuli in the blind field can restore perceptual abilities. This review summarizes key developments in training approaches, some of the mechanistic insights they have revealed, and limitations and opportunities that have emerged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.