ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2025
Local and systemic factors both required for full renewal of deer antlers, and systemic factors only for generic cutaneous regenerative healing.
Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Views on Antlers Then and Now: Past and Present Concepts of Their Development and Histogenesis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Pre-Regenerative Endothelial Cells Empowered by Antler Blood Exosomes Orchestrate Peripheral Nerve Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Deer antler velvet as a multifunctional natural resource for biomedical and nutraceutical applications.Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deer antlers are the only mammalian organs that periodically regenerate from permanent bony protuberances (pedicles). Antler regeneration relies on the presence of pedicle periosteum (PP) and starts from regenerative healing of wounds created following the hard antler casting. Interestingly, PP deletion (removal of local factors) abolishes antler regeneration and the transition to velvet skin (shiny and hair sparsely populated) but cannot inhibit regenerative wound healing although the healed tissue is of pedicle type (scalp-like); this indicates that systemic factors from circulating blood contribute to the generic regenerative wound healing. Subsequently, we created full-thickness excisional (FTE) skin wounds on the forehead region in sika deer. Different healing outcomes ensued, namely regeneration or formation of a scar, depending on whether the intervention took place during the period of antler regeneration (ARP; spring-summer) or in the period where antler regeneration does not occur (non-ARP; winter). Forehead wounds during ARP exhibited regenerative healing, whereas during the non-ARP, healing took place but with a scar. Therefore, systemic factors from the circulating blood during the ARP must be responsible for this outcome. Topical application of deer blood plasma (a source of systemic factors) from ARP to FTE wounds in rats promoted regenerative healing, whereas, that from non-ARP failed to do so. Further evaluation showed that regenerative healing was achieved through increased cell proliferation, impaired inflammatory response, reduced myofibroblast transformation, and orchestrated collagen remodeling accompanied by an increase in the ratio of TGF-β3 to TGF-β1. Comparative proteomics analysis of deer plasma identified some highly up-regulated factors from the plasma in ARP (ARPP) with regeneration-stimulating-potential, such as IGF1 and PRG4. Topical application of IGF1 or IGF1 + PRG4 to rat FTE wounds greatly promoted regenerative healing; particularly in the combination of IGF1 and PRG4 group. In summary, our findings convincingly demonstrate that the systemic factors from deer blood taken during ARP contain factors capable of inducing regenerative wound healing and that this effect is not species-specific. Because there are almost no restrictions on the supply of deer blood in ARP, our findings have laid the foundation for devising effective therapies for scar-less wound healing in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.