Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493264›Full record

Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2025

Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study.

Davide Brilli, Matteo Giansanti, Michele Cassetta

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06661551 (Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery? a Randomized Clinical Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06661551 nacompletednot on this map

Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery? a Randomized Clinical Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Roma La SapienzaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsMalocclusion, Malocclusion in Children, Malocclusion, Displaced or Missing TeethArmsMiniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide BrilliDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta, 6, 00161, Roma, RM, Italy. davidebrilli@gmail.com.
Matteo GiansantiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta, 6, 00161, Roma, RM, Italy.
Michele CassettaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta, 6, 00161, Roma, RM, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate intergenerational differences in miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault using dynamic computer-assisted surgery (d-CAS), and to assess the correlation between the number of surgeries, and both accuracy variables and procedure duration. MATERIALS AND

methods72 subjects were enrolled and for each two miniscrews were inserted in the paramedian region via d-CAS (144 overall). Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups according to the operator's generation: Group A (Generation X), Group B (Generation Y), and Group C (Generation Z). CBCT scans were superimposed to evaluate five variables: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex-Vertical, and angular deviation. Procedure duration was calculated. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey and Dunn's tests and Pearson Correlation. P-value was set at ≤ 0.05.

resultsANOVA test demonstrated significant differences between the three groups in Entry-3D (P < 0.001), Entry-2D (P < 0.001), and Apex-3D (P = < 0.001) parameters, while Kruskal-Wallis test found a significant difference in angular deviation (P = 0.003). Post-hoc comparison revealed significant differences between groups A and C, and groups B and C. Pearson correlation indicated a negative correlation between intervention time and number of surgeries.

conclusionsMiniscrew insertion using d-CAS is operator-dependent, and the generational cohort of the operator is a factor that influences certain accuracy parameters. There is a correlation between the progression of surgeries and a reduction in the time employed. Understanding the impact of generational differences can encourage the use of digital technologies for novices in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT06661551 (clinicaltrials.gov; 10/25/2024).

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsClinical CompetenceOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresPalateSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesYoung AdultAccuracyDynamic computer-guided surgeryGenerationsMiniscrews, TADsNavigation systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.