Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493259›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2026

How Should We Grade the Quality of a Transthoracic Echocardiogram: Results from a Survey from the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Imaging Working Group.

Inga Voges, Massimiliano Cantinotti, Owen Miller, Gerald Greil, Heynric Grotenhuis, Almudena Ortiz-Garrido, Francesca Raimondi, Colin J McMahon

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Inga VogesDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Massimiliano CantinottiDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, National Research Council-Tuscany Region G. Monasterio Foundation (FTGM), Massa, Pisa, Italy.
Owen MillerEvelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK.
Gerald GreilUniversity of Texas Southwestern (UTSW)/Children's Health, 1935 Medical District Drive, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Heynric GrotenhuisDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Almudena Ortiz-GarridoPaediatric Division, Paediatric Cardiology Department, Hospital Materno Infantil, Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Francesca RaimondiPaediatric Cardiology Department, John Paul XXIII Children's Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Colin J McMahonDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland. cmcmahon992004@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the current status about quality grading, resources, and training in pediatric echocardiography, to define gaps in this field, and to develop potential strategies for quality improvement. A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatric cardiologists within the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The questionnaire contained questions regarding assessment of quality, training and feedback in the field of pediatric echocardiography. Thirty-one European pediatric cardiologists from 17 countries participated. Most participants agreed (n = 28, 90%) that it is important to have standards for echocardiography quality grading for trainees. Objective instruments, however, are largely not available. Among a list of criteria on how to grade quality, quantitative or qualitative criteria with additional formative feedback was ranked highest by the respondents (53%). Although the correct diagnosis, followed by the correct use of two-dimensional (2D) imaging and the correct use of color Doppler across all valves and septae were listed as most important when performing transthoracic echocardiography, a matrix of the eight most important parameters was designed. The results show that quality grading in pediatric echocardiography varies highly among European centers. The matrix provided is a visual instrument whereby trainees can gauge the evolution in their skill as echocardiographers.

Indexed as

CardiologyClinical CompetenceEchocardiographyHeart Defects, CongenitalPediatricsChildEuropeHumansQuality ImprovementSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesFeedbackPediatric echocardiographyQuality criteriaTrainingTransfer of training

Identifiers

PMID40493259
PMCPMC12901096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.