ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
How Should We Grade the Quality of a Transthoracic Echocardiogram: Results from a Survey from the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Imaging Working Group.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the current status about quality grading, resources, and training in pediatric echocardiography, to define gaps in this field, and to develop potential strategies for quality improvement. A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatric cardiologists within the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The questionnaire contained questions regarding assessment of quality, training and feedback in the field of pediatric echocardiography. Thirty-one European pediatric cardiologists from 17 countries participated. Most participants agreed (n = 28, 90%) that it is important to have standards for echocardiography quality grading for trainees. Objective instruments, however, are largely not available. Among a list of criteria on how to grade quality, quantitative or qualitative criteria with additional formative feedback was ranked highest by the respondents (53%). Although the correct diagnosis, followed by the correct use of two-dimensional (2D) imaging and the correct use of color Doppler across all valves and septae were listed as most important when performing transthoracic echocardiography, a matrix of the eight most important parameters was designed. The results show that quality grading in pediatric echocardiography varies highly among European centers. The matrix provided is a visual instrument whereby trainees can gauge the evolution in their skill as echocardiographers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.