ReviewBasic research in cardiology2025
Exploring hiPSC-CM replacement therapy in ischemic hearts.
Review in Basic research in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- TGF-β signalling drives chemotaxis of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in response to MI stimulus.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of heart failure and death worldwide. The loss of cardiomyocytes following a myocardial infarction drives the remodeling process, which, in most cases, ultimately leads to heart failure. Since the available treatment options only slow down the remodeling process without tackling the causes of heart failure onset (i.e., cardiomyocyte loss and inability of the remaining cardiomyocytes to enter the cell cycle and regenerate the heart), in the last two decades, cardiovascular research focused on finding alternative solutions to regenerate the heart. So far, the investigated approaches include a variety of methods aiming at manipulation of non-coding RNAs, such as long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and microRNA (miRNA), and growth factors to enable the cardiomyocytes to re-enter the cell cycle, direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes (CM), and CM replacement therapy, all of them with the main goal to replace the loss of cardiomyocytes and restore the heart function. The development of reprogramming protocols from somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Yamanaka and Takahashi, along with advancements in differentiation protocols to generate almost pure populations of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs), has fostered optimism in cardiac regenerative medicine. Despite these advancements, critical concerns arose regarding the survival and retention of the engrafted cells, arrhythmogenicity, and immune response. Over time, much effort has been put into enhancing iPSC-CM therapy with different methods, ranging from anti-apoptotic small molecule-based approaches to tissue engineering. In this review, we discuss the evolution of cardiac cell therapy, highlighting recent advancements and the remaining challenges that must be overcome to translate this promising approach into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.