Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493211›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Direct vertebral rotation (DVR) spinal instrumentation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5 C.

Emmanuel Alonge, Gengming Zhang, HongQi Zhang, Chaofeng Guo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel AlongeDepartment of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Xiangya Road 87, Changsha, 410008, China. emmanuelfema@hotmail.com.
Gengming ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Xiangya Road 87, Changsha, 410008, China.
HongQi ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Xiangya Road 87, Changsha, 410008, China.
Chaofeng GuoDepartment of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Xiangya Road 87, Changsha, 410008, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) with extended upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) using the direct vertebral rotation (DVR) technique in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke type 5 C. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 120 patients with AIS Lenke 5 C with a lower-end vertebra (LEV) at L4 were prospectively enrolled and randomized into two groups based on the planned LIV: L3 (n = 44) or L4 (n = 50). All patients underwent posterior instrumentation with the DVR technique, with the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) positioned at the upper end vertebra (UEV) + 1 or + 2. The final LIV was determined intraoperatively based on fluoroscopic assessment of disc alignment after DVR correction. Clinical and radiographic outcomes, including coronal balance, sagittal alignment, and complications, were evaluated preoperatively, at six months post-surgery, and at a minimum three-year follow-up.

resultThe mean follow-up duration was 39.8 ± 3 months for both groups, with no significant difference between them (P = 0.782). Coronal balance correction rates were comparable between the L3 and L4 groups, showing no significant differences at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). However, the number of fused segments differed significantly, with an average of 7.8 levels in the L3 group and 8.7 levels in the L4 group (P = 0.001). The distance between the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) and the L3 inner pedicle on convex side-bending films was the primary parameter for selecting L3 as the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Notably, no complications such as adding-on or distal junctional kyphosis were observed in both groups.

conclusionSelecting the LIV at L3, when feasible based on intraoperative disc alignment, can preserve spinal mobility and reduce the number of fused segments without compromising correction outcomes. The CSVL-L3 inner pedicle distance on preoperative convex side-bending films is a useful predictor for the selection of appropriate LIV level for AIS Lenke 5 C with DVR. These findings highlight the importance of individualized LIV selection and intraoperative assessment in optimizing outcomes for patients with AIS Lenke 5 C. Additionally, raising the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) enhances the correction of the thoracic curve, levels the rib hump, and improves shoulder balance in patients with AIS Lenke 5 C.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRotationTreatment OutcomeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisDirect vertebrae rotationLenke 5CPosterior only

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.