Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493200›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A physical model links structure and function in the plant immune system.

Benjamin G Weiner, Hanna Märkle, Eric Laderman, Choghag Demirjian, Joy Bergelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin G WeinerUnited States Department of Energy, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, Washington, DC 20024.
Hanna MärkleDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-4854
Eric LadermanDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Choghag DemirjianDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Joy BergelsonDepartment of Biology, Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0001-7893-7387

Funding

Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, NYU Abu Dhabi 0000000Center for the Study of Physics and Biology, Rockefeller University 00000000NSF GEMS Biology Integration Institute 2022049Simons Foundation International 1308072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) is an important part of the plant immune system, allowing plants to sense and respond to harmful pathogen proteins known as "effectors." Effectors can be sensed directly or indirectly by NLR (Nucleotide-binding Leucine-rich Repeat) proteins, many of which "guard" the plant proteins targeted by effectors. Although a few effector-target-NLR interactions have been characterized, a general understanding of how these molecular interactions give rise to a functioning immune system is lacking. Here, we present a physics-based model of ETI based on protein-protein interactions. We show that the simplest physical model consistent with the biology gives rise to a robust immune sensor and explains the empirical phenomenon of effector interference as a generic consequence of molecules competing for binding partners. Using the evolutionarily conserved ZAR1 defense gene as a model, we explain how more complex interaction networks integrate multiple pathogen signals into a single response. We then examine alternatives to a guarding architecture, including direct sensing, decoys, and blended "integrated decoy" strategies, and reveal that these sensing architectures obey functional trade-offs between their sensitivity, target protection, and proteomic cost. This allows a quantitative analysis of the trade-offs between different forms of ETI. We discuss these findings in the context of the evolutionary forces shaping the plant immune system.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant ImmunityPlantsArabidopsis ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNLR ProteinsPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNLR ProteinsPlant ProteinsZAR1 protein, ArabidopsisETINLRphysics-based modelplant immune systemprotein–protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID40493200
PMCPMC12184366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.