ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Evaluation of artificial-intelligence-based liver segmentation and its application for longitudinal liver volume measurement.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate liver-volume measurements from CT scans are essential for treatment planning, particularly in liver resection cases, to avoid postoperative liver failure. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to variability. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), specifically convolutional neural networks, have enhanced liver segmentation accuracy. We aimed to identify optimal CT phases for AI-based liver volume estimation and apply the model to track liver volume changes over time. We also evaluated temporal changes in liver volume in participants without liver disease.
methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, we assessed the performance of an open-source AI-based liver segmentation model previously reported, using non-contrast and dynamic CT phases. The accuracy of the model was compared with that of expert radiologists. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated across various CT phases, including arterial, portal venous, and non-contrast, to validate the model. The model was then applied to a longitudinal study involving 39 patients without liver disease (527 CT scans) to examine age-related liver volume changes over 5 to 20 years.
resultsThe model demonstrated high accuracy across all phases compared to manual segmentation. Among the CT phases, the highest DSC of 0.988 ± 0.010 was in the arterial phase. The intraclass correlation coefficients for liver volume were also high, exceeding 0.9 for contrast-enhanced phases and 0.8 for non-contrast CT. In the longitudinal study, the model indicated an annual decrease of 0.95%.
conclusionThis model provides high accuracy in liver segmentation across various CT phases and offers insights into age-related liver volume reduction. Measuring changes in liver volume may help with the early detection of diseases and the understanding of pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40493176What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.