Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493060›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Stay or go? Outcomes of lower limb arthroplasty in patients travelling away from home for surgery: A cross-sectional analysis of the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) comparing patient residence and hospital remoteness.

Corey Scholes, Carl Holder, Christopher Vertullo, Matthew Broadhead

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corey ScholesEBM Analytics, Sydney, Australia. cscholes@ebma.com.au.
Carl HolderSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Christopher VertulloAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, Australia.
Matthew BroadheadUniversity of New South Wales Rural Clinical School, Coffs Harbour, Australia. matthew.broadhead@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe relationship between remoteness of patient residence and post-surgical outcomes is yet to be examined. This study aimed to assess whether incidence of all-cause revision up to two years following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty varies with the remoteness of a patient's residence at the time of surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from 1-Sep-1999 to 31-Dec-2022 were analysed. The Modified Monash Model of remoteness classification categorised patient residence and hospital location into metro-regional and rural-remote. The primary outcome was all-cause revision within two years after surgery for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis as the primary diagnosis. Cumulative percent revision (CPR) rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported with hazard ratios (HR) between subgroups of residential and hospital remoteness.

resultsTwo-year CPR for primary TKA ranged from 1.8% (95% CI 1.7-1.9) to 2.2% (95% CI 1.8-2.7). Patients residing in rural-remote areas who travelled to metro-regional hospitals displayed significantly higher CPR following TKA compared to patients treated at rural-remote facilities (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, P = 0.001). Patients residing in rural-remote areas that stayed in-area for surgery displayed significantly reduced CPR compared to metro-regional patients that stayed in-area (HR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001). Infection was the dominant reason for TKA revision. No differences in revision risk were observed between patient and hospital combinations for primary THA.

conclusionsTravel distance, but not remoteness of a patient's residence, may be associated with cumulative risk of early revision of primary TKA, particularly in regional/remote patients travelling out of area, but not for patients undergoing THA. Further work is needed to clarify whether revision differences are due to variability in the clinical threshold for offering revision arthroplasty between regional and metropolitan surgeons, or improved outcomes of the primary procedure.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeTravelAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesReoperationTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyHipKneeMetropolitanRegionalRevisionTravel

Identifiers

PMID40493060
PMCPMC12152014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.