SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis in paediatrics: a systematic review.
Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging Nanomedicine Strategies for Sepsis: Immunomodulation and Beyond.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is widely used for prophylaxis in paediatric patients at high risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) but its use is off-label and there is significant variability in dosage and frequency. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the published data on prophylactic LAmB use in the paediatric population and to present the reported proportions of breakthrough IFD and the associated toxicity profile.
methodsEMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database were systematically searched for primary research reporting on the use of LAmB as prophylaxis for IFD in the paediatric population up to 7 December 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
resultsTwenty studies, comprising three clinical trials, 12 cohort studies, two point-prevalence surveys and three pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, with 2015 patients were included. A total of 717 cases presented individual patient data. Breakthrough IFD occurred in 7.2% (49/676). The most recognized side effects were hypokalaemia in 23.2% (125/538) and derangement of liver function tests in 15.0% (49/327). Discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 6.0% (30/503) of patients. Of the four studies reporting PK data, two examined serum levels of LAmB, one analysed CSF levels and the remaining study peritoneal levels.
conclusionsDespite widespread use of prophylactic LAmB, this systematic review highlights the paucity of paediatric data supporting its use. The heterogeneity observed in populations, dosing regimens and study design prevents conclusions being reached on its efficacy or the superiority of one dosing regimen. Overall, there is a clear need for further high-quality robust clinical data and targeted PK studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.