ReviewCytotherapy2025
Immune Monitoring after Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines by the ISCT Stem Cell Engineering Committee.
Review in Cytotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) Therapy: Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy, and Future Perspectives.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and systems biology analysis in stem cell research and therapeutics development.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and cell therapy (TCT) are potentially lifesaving treatments for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies and life-threatening acquired and genetic hematologic disorders. However, these treatments face significant challenges, particularly in the risks of relapse and severe toxicity, leading to both relapse-related and non-relapse mortality (NRM). The immune system plays a critical role in controlling these risks, but predictive immune biomarkers for relapse and toxicity have yet to be fully established. To better understand factors driving outcomes in TCT recipients, researchers are increasingly relying on minimally invasive specimens for analysis, such as peripheral blood. These liquid biopsies provide a cost-effective and rapid means to evaluate parameters such as minimal residual disease and genomic mutation profiles. The evolution of these techniques opens new possibilities for monitoring immune reconstitution, including tracking immune cell development and the diversity of surface and secreted biomarkers. This review presents a practical guideline for establishing an immune monitoring program tailored to the TCT environment. By adopting a proactive, harmonized approach, such programs can enhance prognosis prediction and enable early relapse detection, potentially surpassing traditional diagnostic methods. While recent advancements are promising, considerable progress is still needed to make liquid biopsies a routine component of clinical practice. © 2025 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.