Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40493000›Full record

ReviewCytotherapy2025

Immune Monitoring after Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Guidelines by the ISCT Stem Cell Engineering Committee.

Linda Oppizzi, Kinga Hosszu, Susan Prockop, Alan Bidgoli, Carmen Bonfim, Rachele Ciccocioppo, Annalisa Ruggeri, Martin Maiers, Alice Bertaina, Jaap Jan Boelens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda OppizziDivision of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Kinga HosszuStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: hosszuk@mskcc.org.
Susan ProckopDana Farber/Boston Children's Hospital Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Alan BidgoliDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Aflac Blood and Cancer Disorders Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Carmen BonfimPediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Division and Pele Pequeno Principe Research Institute, Hospital Pequeno Principe, Curitiba, Brazil.
Rachele CiccocioppoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, A.O.U.I. Policlinico G.B. Rossi & University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Annalisa RuggeriUnit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Martin MaiersCenter for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Alice BertainaDivision of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Jaap Jan BoelensStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and cell therapy (TCT) are potentially lifesaving treatments for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies and life-threatening acquired and genetic hematologic disorders. However, these treatments face significant challenges, particularly in the risks of relapse and severe toxicity, leading to both relapse-related and non-relapse mortality (NRM). The immune system plays a critical role in controlling these risks, but predictive immune biomarkers for relapse and toxicity have yet to be fully established. To better understand factors driving outcomes in TCT recipients, researchers are increasingly relying on minimally invasive specimens for analysis, such as peripheral blood. These liquid biopsies provide a cost-effective and rapid means to evaluate parameters such as minimal residual disease and genomic mutation profiles. The evolution of these techniques opens new possibilities for monitoring immune reconstitution, including tracking immune cell development and the diversity of surface and secreted biomarkers. This review presents a practical guideline for establishing an immune monitoring program tailored to the TCT environment. By adopting a proactive, harmonized approach, such programs can enhance prognosis prediction and enable early relapse detection, potentially surpassing traditional diagnostic methods. While recent advancements are promising, considerable progress is still needed to make liquid biopsies a routine component of clinical practice. © 2025 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMonitoring, Immunologiccellular biomarkersfunctional immune recoveryimmune monitoring programimmune reconstitutiontransplantation immunology

Identifiers

PMID40493000
PMCPMC12265769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.