Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492994›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

How forward remapping predicts peri-saccadic biphasic mislocalization.

Yohaï-Eliel Berreby, B Suresh Krishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yohaï-Eliel BerrebyDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
B Suresh KrishnaDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in many visual and oculomotor "priority-map" brain areas display forward receptive field (RF) remapping: they respond to stimuli appearing before a saccade at the spatial location that their RF will occupy after the saccade. Concurrently, psychophysical studies have shown that flashes around saccade onset are systematically mislocalized in various patterns. One prominent pattern is a biphasic pattern, where flashes right before a saccade are mislocalized in the saccade direction (forward) and flashes right after a saccade are mislocalized opposite to the saccade direction (backward). Although forward RF remapping and biphasic mislocalization have been suspected to be linked, how this works has never been explained. Here, we show how persistent flash-evoked activity and decoding of the flash position after the saccade combine to produce this biphasic mislocalization pattern. We implement a rate model, consistent with the essential properties of RF remapping, and show that biphasic mislocalization results from insufficient remapping before the saccade, and residual/inappropriate remapping after the saccade. Less remapping before the saccade produces larger forward mislocalization of pre-saccadic flashes, and less remapping after the saccade produces smaller backward mislocalization of post-saccadic flashes. Forward RF remapping thus captures a biphasic peri-saccadic flash-mislocalization pattern consistent with behavioral data.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSaccadesSpace PerceptionVisual FieldsHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40492994
PMCPMC12165265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.