ReviewJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Addressing Changing Healthcare Needs: A Realist-Inspired Review of Innovative Rehabilitation Care Models.
Review in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE/
objectivesCanadian healthcare is facing an aging population, an increasing prevalence of chronic disease and related disability, and rising healthcare costs. Integrating innovative rehabilitation models of care may help bolster health systems by shifting to a longer-term approach to addressing health and wellbeing. However, little is known about how these care models may look and what is needed to ensure their effective operationalization in practice.
methodsThis realist-inspired narrative review explored how, when, and in what circumstances innovative models of care have been successfully implemented and sustained in rehabilitation. The peer-reviewed and grey literature was searched and subsequently screened by title, abstract, and full text. Data extracted from included articles focused on identifying contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes. A numerical analysis of quantitative data and a conventional content analysis of qualitative abstractions was conducted.
resultsTwenty-six documents published between 2014 and 2021 were uncovered predominantly from Australia and Canada. Overall, for new care models to be successfully implemented and sustained, they need to: (1) have clearly articulated goals, (2) have access to short- and long-term funding, (3) align with key legislative changes to optimise buy-in, (4) take a multidisciplinary approach that is supported by management, and (5) include educational and outreach strategies that can be implemented amongst all interested parties.
conclusionsThe heterogeneity of studies and limitations in their reporting precluded the identification of context-mechanism-outcome configurations typically found in realist reviews. Future implementation research should draw on relevant reporting guidelines to report their findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.