ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
The utility of syndromic respiratory pathogen panels: the premise of flexible and customizable approaches.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic surveillance of enterovirus D68 circulating in 2025 reveals the emergence of a novel A2/B3 recombinant lineage.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extended respiratory panels have been limited to specific patient populations due to cost and inconclusive clinical utility. Customizing syndromic panels offers a way to balance clinical utility and available resources. In this study, we evaluated strategies and assessed the value of flexible, customized respiratory panels. A total of 200 specimens from symptomatic patients (December 2023 to September 2024), negative for SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV, were tested with the LIAISON PLEX Respiratory Flex Assay-an extended respiratory panel that offers flexibility in target selection. The study assessed additional diagnoses, correlations with institutional and state-wide pathogen prevalence, and whether customizable panels could optimize diagnostic yield. Sixty-two samples (31%) negative for SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV tested positive for other targets, primarily rhinovirus/enterovirus (60%), correlating with local and state prevalence. Weighted estimates for 18,373 symptomatic patients during the study period modeled a prevalence of 14.3% for rhinovirus/enterovirus, followed by HPIV-3, adenovirus, and coronavirus. During the study period, 6% of patients received the standard of care extended respiratory panel order after a negative SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV result, duplicating SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV testing. Leveraging a flexible feature could have resulted in an estimated staff time reduction of 5,545 minutes for a second swab collection and running a second test, in addition to the cost of running two different panels during a single encounter. Local respiratory pathogen prevalence data can guide target selection in customized panels. The inclusion of high-prevalence targets can increase the likelihood of diagnosis from 12% to nearly 30%. Flexibility in customizing targeted pathogen panels could enhance diagnostic value while conserving institutional resources.IMPORTANCERapid and accurate identification of pathogens causing respiratory tract infections can aid in guiding treatment decisions, reducing healthcare costs, and supporting real-time surveillance of infectious diseases within a community. Limitations of clinical utility beyond SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV are primarily driven by cost and the lack of specific treatment options. There is a need to balance clinical gaps with testing cost and diagnostic stewardship. In this study, we evaluated the utility of flexible, customized respiratory viral panels and reportable targets within a broader set of available targets in an extended respiratory panel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.