Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492626›Full record

SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Benefits and complications of fetal and postnatal surgery for open spina bifida: systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

Y Kunpalin, V S Karadjole, E S B Medeiros, M Domínguez-Moreno, J Sichitiu, N Abbasi, G Ryan, S Shinar, J W Snelgrove, A V Kulkarni and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of open fetal, fetoscopic and postnatal surgical repair for open spina bifida: decision analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Y KunpalinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7388-1414
V S KaradjoleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
E S B MedeirosSchool of Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericordia de Vitoria (EMESCAM), Vitoria, Brazil.
M Domínguez-MorenoMaternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8010-9628
J SichitiuCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4453-1167
N AbbasiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
G RyanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
S ShinarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6352-4846
J W SnelgroveDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A V KulkarniOntario Fetal Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
T Van MieghemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3034-6905

Funding

Lee Adamson Divisional award (Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo derive pooled estimates of maternal, fetal and pediatric outcomes up to the age of 30 months in patients undergoing pre- or postnatal surgery for open spina bifida (OSB).

methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed (non-MEDLINE records), Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, as well as 'gray' literature, for studies reporting on maternal, fetal and/or pediatric outcomes related to pre- or postnatal surgery for OSB. Only studies with inclusion criteria similar to those of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study were included. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed. Meta-analysis of single proportions was performed.

resultsNo case of maternal death was reported following prenatal surgery for OSB. Common maternal complications among those who underwent prenatal surgery included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (open classical hysterotomy, 31%; open minihysterotomy, 33%; hybrid fetoscopy, 32%; percutaneous fetoscopy, 80%) and preterm birth before 32 weeks' gestation (open classical hysterotomy, 12%; open minihysterotomy, 15%; hybrid fetoscopy, 13%; percutaneous fetoscopy, 33%). Among patients who underwent open classical hysterotomy for OSB and later became pregnant again, 4% and 9% experienced placenta accreta spectrum disorder and uterine rupture, respectively, in any subsequent pregnancy. The most common neonatal complications were respiratory distress syndrome, apnea and postnatal surgical wound revision. Perinatal and infant death rates were similar regardless of whether the surgery was performed pre- or postnatally. The rate of cerebrospinal fluid diversion surgery at 12 months after birth was lower following prenatal surgery (open classical hysterotomy, 38%; open minihysterotomy, 17%; hybrid fetoscopy, 36%; percutaneous fetoscopy, 46%) compared with postnatal surgery (81%). The proportion of toddlers walking with or without assistive devices at 30 months after birth was higher in some prenatal surgery groups (open classical hysterotomy, 72%; open minihysterotomy, 66%; percutaneous fetoscopy, 81%) compared with the postnatal repair group (57%). The rate of clean intermittent catheterization for bladder management at 30 months after birth was 39% in the open classical hysterotomy group and 41% in the percutaneous fetoscopy group, compared with 53% in the postnatal surgery group. Each surgical approach was associated with a specific constellation of procedure-related complications.

conclusionsWe provide pooled estimates for maternal, fetal and pediatric outcomes for all currently used perinatal surgical approaches for OSB repair, each of which has its specific advantages and disadvantages. Our data should serve to inform clinical decision analysis to identify the best surgical approach for OSB cases. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

FetoscopySpina Bifida CysticaSpinal DysraphismFemaleHumansHysterotomyInfantInfant, NewbornPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyPregnancy Outcomefetal surgeryfetoscopic surgerymyelomeningocelepostnatal surgeryspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID40492626
PMCPMC12317308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.