ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Outcomes of ceftriaxone 2 g versus 1 g daily in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCeftriaxone is widely used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but its optimal dosage remains unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with pneumonia between July 2010 and March 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan. They were categorized into those receiving 2 or 1 g/day of ceftriaxone within the first 2 days of hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (composite of biliary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile infection and allergic reactions) and each adverse event. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis was used for comparisons.
resultsAmong the 471 694 eligible patients, 63.3% received 2 g/day and 36.7% received 1 g/day of ceftriaxone. Propensity-score analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between the two groups [4.5% versus 4.6%; risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3% to 0.1%; P = 0.219]. Overall adverse events were slightly higher in the 2 g/day group (1.9% versus 1.8%; RD, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%; P = 0.007), particularly the proportion of C. difficile infection. In the subgroup analysis of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the 2 g/day regimen was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.2% versus 20.4%; RD, -3.2%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -0.9%; P = 0.006).
conclusionsWhile a ceftriaxone dose exceeding 1 g/day may not be necessary for routine pneumonia treatment, a 2 g/day regimen may be considered for patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.