ArticleDevelopmental science2025
The Neural Reality of Pitch Chroma in Early Infancy.
Article in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At the physical level, the experience of pitch has a single determinant: the repetition rate of a waveform in the acoustic signal. Yet, psychologists describe pitch as composed of two perceptual dimensions, height and chroma. Chroma accounts for octave equivalence, whereby sounds with fundamental frequencies at a 1:2 ratio are perceived as sharing the same pitch. A current controversy debates whether chroma is a basic perceptual property dependent on biological constraints or a higher-order cognitive construct shaped by culture. Here, we used high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analyses to characterize pitch processing in humans at 3 months of age. We found that, when exposed to repetitive sequences of orchestral tones, infants encode two separate pitch-related dimensions automatically and with divergent dynamics. Namely, our classifiers isolated height-specific information from the neural signal rapidly after the onset of the auditory sequences. Beyond approximately 600 ms, the performance of pitch height decoders fell to chance level and did not recover. In contrast, neural patterns displaying octave equivalence were retrieved later in the trial, over multiple time windows throughout the unfolding of the auditory sequence, and after sequence offset. Overall, this study reveals that very early in human development, the pitch of naturally rich tones is processed over two distinct encoding stages, capturing not only their absolute height but also their relative position in the octave. We speculate that separate encoding mechanisms reflect distinct functional roles carried by the two dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.