Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492424›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

'They Just Said It Was My Mood. I Was Trying to Get Attention': Exploring Barriers to Psychological Support for People Impacted by Contaminated Blood in England.

Eva Cyhlarova, Jessica Carlisle, Emily Warren, Martin Knapp, Ellen Nolte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva CyhlarovaCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1755-6676
Jessica CarlisleCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Emily WarrenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Ellen NolteDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

This study was funded by the NIHR Policy Research Programme through its core support to the Policy Innovation Research Unit (Project No: PR-PRU-1217-20602). The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBetween the 1970s and the early 1990s, over 30,000 individuals in the United Kingdom were infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis C virus following treatment with NHS-supplied blood and blood products, with devastating consequences. This study aims to better understand the psychological support needs of these individuals and their families, and to identify barriers to accessing support in England.

methodsForty-one individuals infected with HIV and/or hepatitis C virus and 11 affected family members were interviewed, as well as 14 mental health practitioners and experts involved in psychological support services across the United Kingdom. Data were analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsOnly a few infected and affected participants had received mental health support, and only just over half knew about the availability of funding for psychological support from the England Infected Blood Support Scheme. Participants identified a number of barriers preventing them from accessing support. These included personal and social factors such as family responsibilities, stigma and secrecy. Structural barriers to access were a lack of available mental health support, limited understanding among professionals of the contaminated blood scandal, discrimination in healthcare, and difficulties finding suitable therapists and navigating referral systems. When individuals managed to access support, it was often perceived as inadequate or ineffective. Practitioners also identified a substantial need for psychological support within the infected and affected communities, and described support provided as inadequate, with little guidance and limited availability of competent practitioners. Practitioners also emphasised the need for long-term and tailored treatment approaches to address the profound mental and physical health impacts of infected blood.

conclusionsExisting psychological support systems in England, both public and private, fail to meet the needs of infected and affected communities. Our findings show a substantial and increasing need for accessible, effective and individualised services. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was carried out from August 2022 to August 2023, during the period when the statutory Infected Blood Inquiry was conducting public hearings and soliciting witness statements from people infected or affected by the contaminated blood scandal. A key consideration of our work was therefore the potential additional burden on participants who were asked to reflect on their experiences as survivors and/or bereaved family members of infected individuals within the broader context of the Inquiry. We were aware of the emotional weight this might place on participants. To address this, we collaborated with several organisations supporting infected and affected individuals in autumn 2022: the British Red Cross, the Haemophilia Society, the Hepatitis C Trust, the Terrence Higgins Trust, and the Haemophilia & Bleeding Disorders Counselling Association. Representatives of these organisations included individuals who had been infected themselves, as well as mental health practitioners. We held extensive discussions with these organisations on the contaminated blood scandal, the experiences of those impacted, and the support available. They also provided feedback on our draft research materials (information sheet and interview topic guide), which we incorporated into our final versions, and reviewed our findings. In addition, these organisations also acted as facilitators to engage infected and affected people to participate in the study, where this was possible.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHepatitis CHIV InfectionsMental Health ServicesSocial SupportAdultEnglandFamilyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Stigmabarrierscontaminated bloodhepatitis Chuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)mental healthpsychological support

Identifiers

PMID40492424
PMCPMC12149982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.