Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492371›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)

Factors Affecting Sleep Among Dogs and Cats in a Veterinary Intensive Care Unit.

Emma A Devereux, Alana V Ejezie, Alex M Lynch, Margaret E Gruen, Stefanie J LaJuett, James B Robertson, Valery F Scharf

Abstract readObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Effects of Light on Vertebrate Welfare: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma A DevereuxDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-906X
Alana V EjezieDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Alex M LynchDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-094X
Margaret E GruenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-8849
Stefanie J LaJuettDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
James B RobertsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Valery F ScharfDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-9005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the amount of sleep obtained by hospitalized dogs and cats in an intensive care setting and to identify factors that may impact veterinary patients' sleep.

designA prospective, observational study spanning a 4-week period in June of 2020.

settingAcademic teaching hospital. ANIMALS: A total of 96 dogs and 16 cats hospitalized in the ICU during the 4-week study period.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatient activity was categorized as active, resting, or asleep and was recorded along with ICU environmental data on an hourly basis. Environmental data consisted of subjective assessment of noise level, ambient lighting, number of people present, and number of hospitalized patients. The median observed time asleep was 40% and 11% for dogs and cats, respectively. During natural nighttime hours (9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.), the odds of a patient being asleep were 1.7 times higher if lights were dimmed (p < 0.001). Patients were also less likely to be asleep with higher noise levels (odds ratio 0.66 for each increase in noise level, p = 0.003).

conclusionsHospitalized dogs and cats experience sleep disturbances similar to those reported in human ICU patients. Ambient noise and light are significant factors contributing to sleep disruption in cats and dogs hospitalized in a veterinary ICU. The findings of this study support implementing efforts to promote patient sleep through environmental modifications in the veterinary intensive care setting. Additional research is needed to establish objective means of assessing sleep in hospitalized dogs and cats, to determine sleep patterns of hospitalized veterinary patients, and to quantify the impact of sleep disturbances on veterinary patient convalescence.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesIntensive Care UnitsSleepAnimalsCatsDogsFemaleHospitals, AnimalMaleNoiseProspective Studiesambient lightingenvironmental modificationICUnoisesleep disruption

Identifiers

PMID40492371
PMCPMC12322353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.