ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for in-hospital mortality prediction in children under 5 years with heart failure.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) in children under five years of age carries a high risk of in-hospital mortality, yet existing pediatric risk assessment tools lack specificity for this population. There is a pressing need for reliable, interpretable prediction models tailored to pediatric HF. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 630 hospitalized children under five with heart failure from 2013 to 2024. After excluding those with uncorrected congenital heart disease or terminal comorbidities, 67 variables were assessed, and seven key predictors were identified using the Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning models were developed; the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model was selected and interpreted using SHAP. External validation included 73 additional cases. Results: The XGB model achieved high predictive performance (AUC: 0.916 training, 0.851 internal validation, 0.846 external validation). The top predictors were NT-proBNP, pH, PCT, LDH, WBC, creatinine, and platelet count. SHAP analysis confirmed the clinical relevance of these variables. Conclusion: This study presents a reliable, interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in young children with heart failure. It holds promise for early risk stratification and timely intervention, potentially improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.