ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025
Understanding the needs of African researchers involved in implementation and dissemination science.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prostate cancer in Nigeria: a scoping review and meta-analysis of current evidence on process indicators and interventions.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implementation science focuses on the study and application of methods and strategies to facilitate the systematic adoption of evidence-based interventions and programs that enhance cancer prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment and survivorship outcomes. Despite concerted efforts by African governments, international organizations and private sectors to mitigate the cancer burden, significant challenges persist in delivering effective and equitable cancer care across the continuum. The study assessed the needs of researchers and clinicians in Africa engaged in implementation and dissemination science. Methods: Data were gathered to explore gaps in collaboration, mentorship and funding while also examining the barriers and enablers to building implementation science capacity. Results: The findings revealed a growing interest in implementation science among African clinicians and researchers. However, significant challenges were identified, including difficulties in finding collaborators, limited access to mentors and inadequate funding opportunities. These gaps have hindered the ability of professionals to address the escalating cancer burden effectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that substantial gaps in implementation science capacity exist in Africa, which must be addressed to improve cancer care outcomes. Strengthening capacity in this field is critical to equipping researchers and clinicians to manage the rising cancer burden. Recommendations: The study recommends a multifaceted approach to building implementation science capacity in Africa. Key strategies include mentorship programs, targeted training, increased stakeholder involvement and the establishment of sustainable funding mechanisms to support research and practice in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.