Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492224›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025

Clinicopathological prognostic factors for survival in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective study from a tertiary cancer centre from North-West India.

Niketa Thakur, Ramandeep Singh, Sunigdha, Rajiv Devgan, Abhishek Sharma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07130162 (Detection of Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class U Protein as Serum Biomarker for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07130162 not yet recruitingnot on this map

Detection of Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class U Protein as Serum Biomarker for Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled96ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMeasurement of serum PIGU protein concentrations of patients and controls by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niketa ThakurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, HP 174037, India.
Ramandeep SinghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Amritsar 143001, India.
SunigdhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Amritsar 143001, India.
Rajiv DevganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Amritsar 143001, India.
Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar 143501, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Among women worldwide, breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy. Understanding potential prognostic indicators is critical for selecting the optimal treatment modalities, evaluating the response and creating a follow-up plan. In this retrospective study, the clinical and pathological features of primary breast cancer patients who presented to the tertiary cancer centre in the past 10 years were retrospectively studied and analysed to assess their correlation with survival. Patients and methods: Histopathologically confirmed breast cancer patients presenting between January 2014 and December 2023 were included in this study. Clinical data and treatment details including the surgical procedure, chemotherapy and radiation treatment were collected from the medical records. The study utilised both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to determine the most significant independent prognostic variables for overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 676 patients were treated for breast cancer in our centre between January 2014 and December 2023. The median age was 50 years. Three seventy nine patients (56.0%) presented with early breast cancer at the time of diagnosis while 272 patients (40.2%) had locally advanced breast cancer corresponding to clinical stage III. Twenty one (3.1%) patients presented with stage IV. In the univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with OS were stage at presentation, grade, positive lymph node status, number of positive lymph nodes, presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), presence of perinodal extension (PNE) and distant metastasis at presentation. On multivariate analysis, grade of tumor, LVSI and PNE were significant factors affecting survival outcome. Conclusion: Clinical stage at presentation, tumour grade, lymph node status, presence of LVSI, PNE and tumour grade were the prognostic variables substantially associated with survival. A comprehensive approach that includes early detection and appropriate treatment modalities tailored to individual patient characteristics is essential for optimising survival outcomes in breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinicopathologicalprognostic factorssurvival

Identifiers

PMID40492224
PMCPMC12146560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.