Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492217›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2025

Cancer awareness through school curriculum: evidence and recommendations from a quasi-experimental study among school children in the State of Kerala, India.

Phinse Mappalakayil Philip, Neethu Ambali Parambil, Maya Padmanabhan, Satheesan Balasubramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phinse Mappalakayil PhilipDepartment of Preventive and Community Oncology, Malabar Cancer Centre - Post Graduate Institute of Oncological Sciences and Research, Thalassery 670103, Kerala, India.
Neethu Ambali ParambilDepartment of Preventive and Community Oncology, Malabar Cancer Centre - Post Graduate Institute of Oncological Sciences and Research, Thalassery 670103, Kerala, India.
Maya PadmanabhanDepartment of Clinical Research and Biostatistics, Malabar Cancer Centre - Post Graduate Institute of Oncological Sciences and Research, Thalassery 670103, Kerala, India.
Satheesan BalasubramanianMalabar Cancer Centre - Post Graduate Institute of Oncological Sciences and Research, Thalassery 670103, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer is emerging as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in India and other countries worldwide. Preventable risk factors for cancer, such as the use of tobacco and alcohol, unhealthy diets and physical inactivity, are often initiated and established during adolescence. Identifying effective strategies for engaging adolescents in cancer-protective behaviours is essential. The current study investigates the potential of schools as settings and school curricula as tools for raising cancer awareness among teenagers. Methods: Consultative meetings and workshops were conducted with education, health and social services experts to develop a primer for cancer control in the school curriculum. Textbooks were scanned to determine the extent of cancer-related topics for standards five to ten. The study participants' awareness at baseline was assessed using the Cancer Awareness Measure toolkit (version 2.1). Based on these findings, a study package was developed and implemented through trained teachers. A quasi-experimental study design was used to assess the impact of the study package in improving cancer awareness. Results: In the post-intervention survey, the participants from the intervention schools demonstrated significant improvements in their understanding of cancer warning signs (unexplained lump or swelling ( Conclusion: Implementing the cancer awareness study package through classroom teaching improved students' understanding of warning signs and risk factors for cancer. The study emphasised the role of the school as a setting, the school curriculum as a tool and teachers as promoters of cancer prevention education. However, there is no guarantee that this program will work if the learners' environment is not improved through the concurrent teaching of parents. Children learn what they live.

Indexed as

cancer awarenesscancer educationcancer preventionschool curriculum

Identifiers

PMID40492217
PMCPMC12146569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.