Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492168›Full record

ArticleAnalytical science advances2025

Prediction of Bone Formation Rate of Artificial Bone With Machine Learning Models Considering the Variation of Experimental Results.

Yuta Sakai, Shota Horikawa, Mamoru Aizawa, Hiromasa Kaneko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Robust machine learning and ensemble learning approach to predict variation in experimental data for multiple measurements and anomalies.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuta SakaiDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Meiji University, Tama-ku Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Shota HorikawaDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Meiji University, Tama-ku Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Mamoru AizawaDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Meiji University, Tama-ku Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.
Hiromasa KanekoDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Meiji University, Tama-ku Kawasaki Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-6476

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of older people in the world's total population is expected to increase. Bone diseases are more prevalent in older people; therefore, the number of patients with such diseases is expected to increase worldwide. Artificial bone is a biomaterial used in the treatment of bone diseases. Artificial bones with high bone formation rates are desired; however, the results of artificial bone implantation vary. There are also ethical issues associated with animal experiments. Our purpose in this study is to predict the variation in bone formation rates. We created multiple sub-datasets and constructed a machine learning model to predict the variation in bone formation rates by considering the results of multiple measurements. We also propose a metric, Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence, to evaluate the accuracy of the model for predicting variation. We tested the validity of JS divergence by comparing combinations of explanatory variables. Additionally, we found an optimal combination of explanatory variables to construct a model with high predictive accuracy. We expect that the prediction of variation will be useful for improving the practical development of materials and medicines, such as artificial bones, for which stable effects are required, regardless of the individual.

Indexed as

artificial bonebiomaterialmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40492168
PMCPMC12147495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.