ArticleAnalytical science advances2025
Prediction of Bone Formation Rate of Artificial Bone With Machine Learning Models Considering the Variation of Experimental Results.
Article in Analytical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust machine learning and ensemble learning approach to predict variation in experimental data for multiple measurements and anomalies.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proportion of older people in the world's total population is expected to increase. Bone diseases are more prevalent in older people; therefore, the number of patients with such diseases is expected to increase worldwide. Artificial bone is a biomaterial used in the treatment of bone diseases. Artificial bones with high bone formation rates are desired; however, the results of artificial bone implantation vary. There are also ethical issues associated with animal experiments. Our purpose in this study is to predict the variation in bone formation rates. We created multiple sub-datasets and constructed a machine learning model to predict the variation in bone formation rates by considering the results of multiple measurements. We also propose a metric, Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence, to evaluate the accuracy of the model for predicting variation. We tested the validity of JS divergence by comparing combinations of explanatory variables. Additionally, we found an optimal combination of explanatory variables to construct a model with high predictive accuracy. We expect that the prediction of variation will be useful for improving the practical development of materials and medicines, such as artificial bones, for which stable effects are required, regardless of the individual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.