ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Adverse event profile differences between maribavir and valganciclovir: findings from the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-associated postpartum hemorrhage: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of Certolizumab pegol based on FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maribavir and valganciclovir are pharmacotherapeutic options utilized in the management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection post-transplantation. Despite their established utility, a comprehensive assessment of their safety profiles in real-world settings remains lacking, particularly with regards to long-term safety outcomes within a sizable cohort. Objective: The study aims to analyze the adverse event (AE) profiles of maribavir and valganciclovir using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). This endeavor seeks to juxtapose their respective association strengths and furnish clinicians with pertinent clinical reference points. Methods: Employing a methodological framework involving the filtration of the FAERS database by specific drugs (maribavir and valganciclovir), AEs attributed to each agent were meticulously cataloged. We applied various disproportionation analysis techniques, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, to identify and quantify potential signals of AEs associated with maribavir and valganciclovir. Results: There were 999 and 3,454 reports for maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively. Maribavir was primarily associated with the following AEs: dysgeusia (133, 4.07%), taste disorder (127, 3.89%), death (120, 3.67%), fatigue (105, 3.21%), and diarrhea (69, 2.11%). In contrast, the most notable AEs linked to valganciclovir included death (260, 2.59%) and neutropenia (246, 2.59%), leukopenia (175, 1.74%), diarrhea (117, 1.17%), and thrombocytopenia (113, 1.13%). Remarkably, death emerged as an unexpected AE signature for both agents. Key associations were elucidated, notably taste disorder (ROR: 65.23) for maribavir and CMV colitis (ROR: 152.26) for valganciclovir, accentuating distinct AE propensities. Additionally, median onset times for AE manifestation were delineated, with maribavir exhibiting a median onset time of 40 days, compared to 28 days for valganciclovir-associated AEs. Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis of FAERS data enhances our understanding of the safety. These findings hold implications for ongoing clinical surveillance efforts and provide a foundational basis for subsequent investigations into the safety profiles of these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.