Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492107›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025

Application Intention and Influencing Factors of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Patients with Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.

Yan-Yan Xiong, Hong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan-Yan XiongDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiuDivision of Surgery, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-7420-4667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the development of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), TCM has demonstrated unique advantages and satisfactory efficacy in the management of mixed hemorrhoid in the perioperative period. However, under the impact of modern medicine, there is still a long way to go before the clinical application of TCM can be recognised by the public. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand the application intention of TCM in patients with mixed hemorrhoid in the Department of Integrated TCM and Western Medicine and explore its influencing factors. Methods: Patients with mixed hemorrhoid treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2023 were selected using convenience sampling method. The survey was conducted using the general information questionnaire and the application intention scale of TCM. Results: The mean application intention score of TCM in patients with mixed hemorrhoid was 22.6±8.6. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that genders, education, psychological condition, previous participation in TCM-type lectures, previous use of TCM and course of disease were independent factors influencing application intention of TCM. Conclusion: Patients with mixed hemorrhoid showed a moderate level of application intention of TCM. By improving the psychological condition of the patients, the application intention of TCM may be positively affected in this group. However, the lack of longitudinal data and external validation of the scale need to be further improved.

Indexed as

application intentioninfluencing factorsmixed hemorrhoidtraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID40492107
PMCPMC12147813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.