Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40492050›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2025

Frontiers in 3D printing for biobased food packaging.

Dhruv Thakur, Mohammed A Bareen, Achala Gupta, Sampa Saha, Jatindra K Sahu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhruv ThakurFood and Bioprocess Engineering Lab, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Mohammed A BareenFood and Bioprocess Engineering Lab, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Achala GuptaFood and Bioprocess Engineering Lab, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Sampa SahaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016 India.
Jatindra K SahuFood and Bioprocess Engineering Lab, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016 India.ORCID 0000-0002-6573-4852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (3D printing) offers design flexibility across various industries, including food processing and packaging. With digital controls, it is possible to fabricate 3D structures layer-by-layer. This review highlights the potential of 3D printing for creating bio-based food packaging with innovative functionalities and additionally, provides a brief overview of traditional and recent techniques for developing food packaging. By layering materials, 3D printing enables the production of sustainable, biocompatible packaging, providing an alternative to traditional methods. The review covers key 3D printing methods for biomaterial-based packaging, comparing them with conventional techniques. Extrusion-based printing is identified as the most suitable technology for developing bio-based packaging. Important factors include material properties, process optimization, and market demand. 3D-printed packaging shows improved water vapor barriers, hydrophobicity, and mechanical properties over casted films. As sustainability becomes increasingly critical, the market for bio-based 3D-printed packaging is expected to grow significantly. Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

3D printingBiobased InksBiomaterialsBioplasticsFood packaging

Identifiers

PMID40492050
PMCPMC12145371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.