ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Osteoarthritis as an evolutionary legacy: Biological ageing and chondrocyte hypertrophy.
Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of aging as it relates osteoarthritis: we can't improve what we can't measure.Connective tissue research · 2025Review
- Validity and reliability of the Flare-OA scale for hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Turkish population: item reduction with Rasch analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive joint disease habitually linked to ageing, characterized by the gradual breakdown of cartilage leading to pain and reduced mobility. Historically viewed as mainly a "wear and tear" condition, new insights suggest that OA may be part of an evolutionary, age-related biological process rather than mainly driven by mechanical damage. Design: This conceptual paper discusses the model of antagonistic pleiotropy that proposes that certain genes beneficial early in life may contribute to diseases in the context of OA. Results: Findings indicate that OA is connected to biological and not to chronological age supporting the idea that OA is not merely a wear and tear process. Chondrocyte hypertrophy, essential in endochondral bone formation at a (pre)reproductive age, is stimulated by a displaced and wrongly timed endochondral ossification quasi-program in age-related OA. Age-related chondrocyte hypertrophic differentiation in articular cartilage is likely driven by loss of loading-induced TGF-β signaling. Conclusion: Comprehending OA within this evolutionary and biological frame provides a solid alternative to the theory of "wear and tear", offering insights into further understanding, prevention and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.