ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
Unveiling the Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics in Sepsis: A Review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of the gut-lung axis in sepsis and the effect of probiotics on pulmonary complications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Source-stratified gut-extraintestinal organ crosstalk in sepsis-associated acute gastrointestinal injury and paralytic ileus: the gut as both driver and target.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis continues to be among the most significant causes of mortality and morbidity globally, as defined by an exaggerated host response to infection resulting in a peak of systemic inflammation, organ dysfunction, and unnecessary mortality. The many complexities of sepsis, such as its pathophysiology, current treatments, and its evolving place within nutrition care, are debated. The major etiologies of sepsis are bacterial, viral, and fungal infections leading to an inappropriate immune response with cytokine storm, endothelial damage, and multiorgan failure. Although there has been advancement in medical management, the current treatment approaches, like antibiotic therapy, fluid therapy, and organ support, are insufficient to decrease mortality; therefore, there is a pressing need for effective treatment. Current studies target the central position of nutrition in sepsis treatment, that is, gut microbiota in immune function and systemic inflammation. Nutritional treatment, encompassing enteral and parenteral nutrition, is designed to support metabolic homeostasis, boost immune resistance, and modulate catabolic stress in critically ill patients. The gut-sepsis axis is also emphasized, since dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction lead to systemic inflammation and aggravate sepsis outcomes. Recent evidence indicates that probiotics can provide adjunct benefits via gut microbiota manipulation, immune system augmentation, and anti-inflammatory effects. This review accentuates the requirement for integrative therapeutic strategies in the form of conventional sepsis treatment augmented by specific nutritional interventions to optimize patient survival and recovery. Follow-up studies must focus on improving individualized nutrition therapy, clarifying the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of sepsis, and finding new therapeutic targets for preventing complications of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.