Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491980›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2025

Unveiling the Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics in Sepsis: A Review.

Zhaopeng Wang, Jiaqi Huang, Peng Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhaopeng WangMedical Department The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin China.
Jiaqi HuangMedical Insurance Office The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin China.
Peng ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Harbin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0658-325X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis continues to be among the most significant causes of mortality and morbidity globally, as defined by an exaggerated host response to infection resulting in a peak of systemic inflammation, organ dysfunction, and unnecessary mortality. The many complexities of sepsis, such as its pathophysiology, current treatments, and its evolving place within nutrition care, are debated. The major etiologies of sepsis are bacterial, viral, and fungal infections leading to an inappropriate immune response with cytokine storm, endothelial damage, and multiorgan failure. Although there has been advancement in medical management, the current treatment approaches, like antibiotic therapy, fluid therapy, and organ support, are insufficient to decrease mortality; therefore, there is a pressing need for effective treatment. Current studies target the central position of nutrition in sepsis treatment, that is, gut microbiota in immune function and systemic inflammation. Nutritional treatment, encompassing enteral and parenteral nutrition, is designed to support metabolic homeostasis, boost immune resistance, and modulate catabolic stress in critically ill patients. The gut-sepsis axis is also emphasized, since dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction lead to systemic inflammation and aggravate sepsis outcomes. Recent evidence indicates that probiotics can provide adjunct benefits via gut microbiota manipulation, immune system augmentation, and anti-inflammatory effects. This review accentuates the requirement for integrative therapeutic strategies in the form of conventional sepsis treatment augmented by specific nutritional interventions to optimize patient survival and recovery. Follow-up studies must focus on improving individualized nutrition therapy, clarifying the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of sepsis, and finding new therapeutic targets for preventing complications of sepsis.

Indexed as

dietgut microbiotaimmune responseinflammationorgan failureprobioticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID40491980
PMCPMC12146495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.