ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
Precise and scalable metagenomic profiling with sample-tailored minimizer libraries.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creating an engine of scientific discovery, an Indo-Japan perspective: learnings from IJNTC 2025 workshop.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Microbiome and resistome dynamics in different stages of commercial broiler production with restricted antimicrobial use.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reference-based metagenomic profiling requires large genome libraries to maximize detection and minimize false positives. However, as libraries grow, classification accuracy suffers, particularly in k-mer-based tools, as the growing overlap in genomic regions among organisms results in more high-level taxonomic assignments, blunting precision. To address this, we propose sample-tailored minimizer libraries, which improve on the minimizer-lowest common ancestor classification algorithm from the widely used Kraken 2. In this method, an initial filtering step using a large library removes non-resemblance genomes, followed by a refined classification step using a dynamically built smaller minimizer library. This 2-step classification method shows significant performance improvements compared to the state of the art. We develop a new computational tool called Slacken, a distributed and highly scalable platform based on Apache Spark, to implement the 2-step classification method, which improves speed while keeping the cost per sample comparable to Kraken 2. Specifically, in the CAMI2 'strain madness' samples, the fraction of reads classified at species level increased by 3.5×, while for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.