Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491948›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025

Supplementary approaches to perinatal depression: a review of pathogenesis, herbal interventions, and dietary supplements.

Quancheng Yang, Yi Lv, Shenrong Gao, Yu Zhang, Xuejia Zhai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quancheng Yang *Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yi Lv *Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shenrong GaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Hubei Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Yu Zhang *Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xuejia Zhai *Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although perinatal depression (PND) has garnered increasing attention, few specific pharmacological treatments exist, particularly for breastfeeding mothers concerned about antidepressant safety. The misconception that "natural is harmless" merits caution; herbal remedies and dietary supplements should be regarded as supplementary interventions pending robust safety evidence. This review summarizes recent advances in PND pathogenesis (neurotransmitter dysregulation, inflammation, hormonal imbalance, and microbiota alterations) and emerging drug development strategies, alongside clinical evidence for herbal and dietary supplements. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) findings reveal that while interventions like saffron and vitamin D show promise, significant limitations persist, including inconsistent efficacy, limited long-term safety data, and potential interactions with perinatal physiology. Caution is warranted until comprehensive studies validate the safety and reliability of natural interventions. This review underscores the need for rigorous trials to identify safe, effective PND treatments, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

dietary supplementsherbal remediesnon-drug interventionpathophysiological mechanismsperinatal depression

Identifiers

PMID40491948
PMCPMC12147673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.