ArticleConservation physiology2025
Comparison of whole blood on filter strips with serum for avian influenza virus antibody detection in wild birds.
Article in Conservation physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Counting cases, conserving species: addressing highly pathogenic avian influenza in wildlife.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Quantifying iris pigmentation irregularities following an avian influenza outbreak: implications for population-level disease surveillance in a colonial seabird.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- Interannual differences in common eider duck exposure to avian influenza viruses at an Arctic colony.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serological surveillance enhances our understanding of influenza A virus (IAV) exposure and dynamics in wild bird populations. Traditional serum-based testing, while effective, poses logistical challenges for large-scale surveillance, particularly in remote regions, for small-bodied species or in scenarios such as hunter-harvested samples where serum collection can be impractical. This study evaluates the use of whole blood collected on high-quality cellulose filter strips as an alternative to serum for detecting antibodies against IAV nucleoprotein (NP) and hemagglutinin (HA) H5 and H7 targets. We tested paired serum and whole blood on filter strips collected from wild birds using the commercially available IDEXX AI MultiS Screen Ab test and in-house competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) developed at the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease (NCFAD) of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Strong correlations (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.