ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Sequencing HIV Diagnostic Samples to Detect Genetic Clusters and Assess Sequence Coverage Gaps.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: HIV molecular cluster detection in the United States relies on HIV sequences obtained from drug resistance testing during clinical care ("routine care sequences"). This approach misses people who are not linked to care or who receive care but have uncollected or unreported sequences. Methods: We collected "HIV test sequences" from remnant serum samples of people testing newly positive from 2018 through 2021 by a large public health laboratory in North Carolina. We incorporated the HIV test sequences into a statewide molecular cluster analysis and assessed impact on "active cluster" detection (≥5 members newly diagnosed). We described data gaps filled by HIV test sequences, comparing (1) the extent of care sequence missingness due to gaps in care linkage vs sequence collection or reporting and (2) the characteristics of people with an HIV test sequence who had a care sequence, care but no care sequence, or no evidence of care. Results: Of 19 770 people included in the cluster analysis, 847 had an HIV test sequence, one-third of whom had no routine care sequence. We identified 13 additional active clusters (a 33% relative increase) and 40 larger active clusters after incorporating HIV test sequences. Most people with an HIV test sequence but no care sequence (78%) had another care indicator, suggesting sequence undercollection or underreporting, but a fifth (22%) had no evidence of care. Conclusions: Higher sequence coverage can improve cluster detection. While increased routine care sequence collection and reporting could fill many data gaps, sequencing remnant HIV test samples could include people without care linkage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.