ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Redefining haemostasis: Role of rotational thromboelastometry in critical care settings.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Viscoelastic testing: Transforming hemostasis management in patients in the medical intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Coagulation dysfunction in term neonatal sepsis: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Precision hemostasis: how viscoelastic testing guides real-time decision-making in trauma.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- Clinical Significance of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for Detection of Early Coagulopathy in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of patients with acute hemorrhage requires addressing the source of bleeding, replenishing blood volume, and addressing any coagulopathy that may be present. Assessing coagulopathy and predicting blood requirements in real-time in patients experiencing ongoing bleeding can pose substantial challenges. In these patients, transfusion concepts based on ratios do not effectively address coagulopathy or reduce mortality. Moreover, ratio-based concepts do not stop bleeding; instead, they just give physicians more time to identify the bleeding source and plan management strategies. In clinical practice, standard laboratory coagulation tests (SLCT) are frequently used to assess various aspects of blood clotting. However, these tests may not always offer a comprehensive understanding of clinically significant coagulopathy and the severity of blood loss. Furthermore, the SLCT have a considerable turnaround time, which may not be ideal for making prompt clinical decisions. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in point-of-care viscoelastic assays like rotational thromboelastometry, which provide real-time, dynamic information about clot formation and dissolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.